Posts

Showing posts from November, 2020

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(5)(I)(A), 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 31(1), 33 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 AND RULE 6 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016

Image
        NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Om Logistics Limited Vs. Servel India Private Limited, (2020) 06 NCLT CK 0035 NCLT allowed the application filed by the applicant, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity 'code') read with Rules 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority), 2016 (for brevity 'the Rules') to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of Corporate Debtor. While allowing the application NCLT held that In the light of that decision, when we shall consider the case in hand then we are of the considered view that since it is specifically mentioned in Section 8(2) of th...

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 3(12), 5(21), 8, 8(1), 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 AND RULE 6 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016

Image
        NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Nitin Gupta Vs. International Land Developers Private Limited, (2020) 06 NCLT CK 0015 NCLT dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity 'code') read with Rules 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority), 2016 (for brevity 'the Rules') with a prayer to initiate the Corporate Insolvency process against the Corporate Debtor. While dismissing the petition NCLT held that In the light of that facts when we shall consider the case in hand then we find that the settlement agreement on the basis of which the present applicatio...

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON RULE 16 OF THE COMPANIES (COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENTS AND AMALGAMATIONS) RULES, 2016 AND SECTION 133, 230, 230(1)(B), 230(8), 231, 232 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

Image
        NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Nanak Consultants Private Limited And Ors Vs. Osiatic Consultants And Investments Private Limited, (2020) 06 NCLT CK 0039 NCLT allowed the petition filed by the petitioner under Sections 230 & 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules framed there under, as in force from time to time, for the Sanction of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. While allowing the petition NCLT held that upon considering the approval accorded by the members and creditors of the petitioner Companies to the proposed Scheme, and the affidavit by the Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs reply submitted by the Tr...