NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 164, 248, 252 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

8383098478, 9667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

8130703334, 9355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Classic Combustions India Private Limited Vs. Registrar Of Companies, (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0026

NCLT allowed the application filed by the applicant, under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the struck off company. While allowing the appeal NCLT held that it is evident from the plea of the Applicant that the Applicant has not questioned the process undertaken by the RoC in striking off the name of the Appellant Company as envisaged under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with attendant Rules. However, the Applicant is seeking restoration of its name in the register as maintained by RoC by relying up on the ground that the Applicant Company as of date is carrying on the business for which it was incorporated and it is in operation and in the circumstances, it is just that the name of the Company should be restored on the Register of Companies as maintained by the Respondent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON RULE 16 OF THE COMPANIES (COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENTS AND AMALGAMATIONS) RULES, 2016 AND SECTION 133, 230, 230(1)(B), 230(8), 231, 232 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

Image
        NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Nanak Consultants Private Limited And Ors Vs. Osiatic Consultants And Investments Private Limited, (2020) 06 NCLT CK 0039 NCLT allowed the petition filed by the petitioner under Sections 230 & 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules framed there under, as in force from time to time, for the Sanction of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. While allowing the petition NCLT held that upon considering the approval accorded by the members and creditors of the petitioner Companies to the proposed Scheme, and the affidavit by the Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs reply submitted by the Tr...
Read more

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 3(12), 5(21), 8, 8(1), 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 AND RULE 6 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016

Image
        NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Nitin Gupta Vs. International Land Developers Private Limited, (2020) 06 NCLT CK 0015 NCLT dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity 'code') read with Rules 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority), 2016 (for brevity 'the Rules') with a prayer to initiate the Corporate Insolvency process against the Corporate Debtor. While dismissing the petition NCLT held that In the light of that facts when we shall consider the case in hand then we find that the settlement agreement on the basis of which the present applicatio...
Read more